Chelsea Fiddyment

Archive for 2009|Yearly archive page

Wysocki, Berger and McCloud discussion questions

In Uncategorized on September 20, 2009 at 5:58 am

[Questions generated from the reading and examples of sequential art]

Sweded project follow-up

In Uncategorized on September 13, 2009 at 2:04 am

“You should blog on the 4 stages of the process: pre-production/brainstorming, shooting, editing, post-production/critique. Note that you shouldn’t have much to say about editing since this project should only be minimally edited, but you should have more to say about the other 3 stages. We’ll go over these in more detail in class.”

[Reflections on the sweded project]

DQ response 2: Drucker and Elkins, everyday looking, “language in the landscape”

In Uncategorized on September 12, 2009 at 10:10 pm

“Elkins writes that there are times when one looks at an object, even a familiar one, it suddenly develops meaning and gains depth that was not there before.  Has this ever happened to you?  What was the object and in what way did you look at it to apprecite [sic] the meaning of it?”

[DQ and class question responses]

Drucker and Elkins discussion questions

In Uncategorized on September 10, 2009 at 5:53 am
  • Drucker suggests that “only language tries to tell us what we see” (94). What example does she cite to illustrate this idea? What is another example of this, and how does it confirm Drucker’s idea?
  • How would you describe Drucker’s idea of “language in context” (99)?
  • Why do you think something as useful and heavily-relied-upon as sight has become a source of pleasure? Is sight practical or enjoyable? Can it be both?

Everyday remediation

In Uncategorized on September 10, 2009 at 4:13 am

“As you go about your daily lives, begin to notice the ways remediation is around you. What examples of remediation do you see, and how do they work? By Thursday, post an example of remediation to your blog and talk about how it’s working.”

[Examples and response]

Graffiti

In Uncategorized on September 10, 2009 at 4:05 am

“For homework, find an example of graffiti (it can be online or something you find on campus or other places you’re been) and post a picture of it to your blog. Do a short analysis, talking about where the graffiti is, who you think did the graffiti, and what is the message behind it or the reason that person did the graffiti.”

[Images and response]

Dodgeball, short and sweded

In Uncategorized on September 8, 2009 at 2:15 am

Dodgeball, the short and sweded version. All roles in this film were played by Steven Sanchez, Dan Breitberg, Davis Son, and me.

[Check out the video]

DQ response 1: BD&G ch. 1, remediation, sweded projects

In Uncategorized on September 1, 2009 at 5:07 pm

“How has the evolution of hypermediacy on the world wide web effected [sic] newspapers?”

[DQ and class question responses]

Bolter, David & Grusin ch. 1 discussion questions

In Uncategorized on September 1, 2009 at 6:10 am

Reading linked here.

  • What does GUI stand for, and how does its “triumph” in personal computing illustrate our increasing desire for immediacy?
  • How have painting, early photography, and digital graphics attempted to deal with the issue of transparency?
  • Does remediation relate more to the concept of immediacy or hypermediacy? Why? What are some examples that support your conclusions?

Thoughts on Be Kind Rewind

In Uncategorized on August 31, 2009 at 10:50 pm

As far as films go, this didn’t involve the best acting by people who are normally pretty reliable in their performances. The camerawork was nothing of note either–scenes were shot at strange angles, things that maybe should have been shown on screen weren’t or were shot badly and vice versa. Strictly from the perspective of enjoyment, Be Kind Rewind wasn’t terrible and I would pick it up again to watch in its entirety. It certainly raises some interesting questions about the pleasure of film-viewing, ownership, and the relationship between business and consumer.

[Further thoughts]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.